Planet X Nibiru Discovered with ALMA Telescope

Planet X Nibiru Discovered with ALMA Telescope
Friday, June 3, 2016 15:19
(Before It's News)
Decades have long passed since the first theories concerning Planet X Nibiru came out,
but today, the presumed existence of the planet still stirs up heated discussions within the scientific community.
The debates are fueled now more than ever as two scientific papers claim discovery for not just one,
but two space objects that may very well be the elusive Planet X Nibiru.  Do you believe in Alien life?
Do you believe in the end of life? Do you believe in Nibiru planet X?
This Video say about Nibiru planet X. You can believe in it or not.
During the preparation of Osiris,
Isis & Planet X,
I had the good fortune and opportunity to read a new book titled Dark Star – The Planet X Evidence by Andy Lloyd.
Andy and I have been acquainted over the Internet for several years,
and both of us were interviewed by Hollywood film-producer Robert Sepehr for the second of his Planet X Videos.
Andy and I have agreed to disagree on certain matters pertaining to Planet X for reasons which will become apparent in this review of his book.
Andy presents his arguments in a logical and efficient manner,
starting with the simpler anomalies of our Solar System and then gradually working into more complex discussions of Dwarf Stars in general and Planet X in particular.
By Chapter 12, Andy has actually overly complicated his theory,
in my opinion; but he has certainly covered all the bases, to use an American baseball metaphor.
For a couple of hundred pages, Andy speculates and theorizes about one aspect of Planet X or another;
and I think that he would agree with me that we are basically at a dead-end in terms of purely “theoretical” analyses.
What we need now is actual physical proof of Planet X, either its telescopic discovery or its sudden passage through the “mainstream” Solar System.
In reviewing Andy’s book,
I shall do it in the order that Andy presented his material.
Most researchers of Planet X Nibiru, myself included,
tend to follow the postulation by Zecharia Sitchin in The Earth Chronicles,
notably The Twelfth Planet, that this “tenth” or “unknown” planet is approximately the size of Uranusand Neptune,
or about 4-5 times larger than the Planet Earth,
and therefore that it is merely an as yet “undiscovered” planet within our Solar System.
Andy, by contrast, equates Planet X with a Brown Dwarf Star, a distant, unseen binary companion of our Sun several times larger than the Planet Jupiter,
with a planetary system of its own.
Whereas I suggest that Planet X is accompanied by an “entourage” or “host” of planetoids and moonlets,
in Andy’s scenario these bodies, seven in all, orbit the Dark Star. The innermost planet of the Dark Star,
the warmest and most hospitable for life, is the Home Planet of the Anunnaki.
The planet farthest from the Dark Star is what becomes visible to peoples on Earth during the perihelial passage of the Dark Star’s system,
leading in turn to all of our ancient “myths” about this “perturber” or “interloper” planet.
Andy’s Dark Star itself does not actually enter the boundaries of the other planets. However,
its “Seventh Moon” (Sitchin’s Nibiru, or “Planet of the Crossing“) does “cross over” into that part of the Solar System between Neptune and Pluto,
close enough and bright enough to be visible to people on Earth, at least for such a sufficiently lengthy time that cosmic legends could be born and later develop around it.
In Cosmic Tree Theory, of course, Planet X Nibiru is coming as close to the Earth as about 60,000 miles (about 100,000 kilometers)
and then stationing itself to our North Pole by an electromagnetic “tether” beam
As it approaches close enough to Earth, its South Magnetic Pole is attracted to our North Magnetic Pole,
like the opposite poles of all magnets, locking it in place above our North Pole for 900 years, approximately a “Millennium of the Gods“,
after which time it “detethers” and returns in its orbit to an aphelion somewhere between here and the O’ort Cloud.
On page 48, Andy writes the following about Sitchin’s Nibiru: “The passages [of Planet X] also present us with evidence that Nibiru/Marduk appeared to the Mesopotamians
as a red star during historical times, and that its heavenly passage was unusual.
It was faint, red, stood still in the sky and then wandered like a planet. This is highly unusual, to say the least.
It is no wonder that the nature of Nibiru remains controversial.”
When I refer to Planet X Nibiru’s “standing still” over our North Pole, I use the expression literally: It stopped
and “stood still”, tethered to Earth as a Winged Disk atop a Cosmic Tree or World Tree or Sacred Tree.
Andy’s and Sitchin’s idea that Nibiru “stood still” refer to that optical illusion we get when any planet seems to “stop” and “go backwards” in its orbit,
which we refer to as its “retrograde movement”.
Neither Andy nor Sitchin would agree with me on the meaning of the concept that it “stood still” in the sky.
As an aside here, let me add that amongst the Velikovskian School there is a group of researchers, most prominently amongst them David Talbott and colleagues,
who believe, as Dr. Immanuel Velikovsky suggested in “On Saturn And The Flood” published by KRONOS Journal (Volume V, Number 1) in the fall of 1979,
that the object
which “stood still” over our North Pole was the Planet Saturn.
In 1996 David Talbott produced a video regarding this idea, titled Remembering The End Of The World.
Some of Talbott’s animated computer graphics at the end of the video are quite well-done, but his absolutely preposterous “Saturn Theory” does not depict the Planet Saturn.
It depicts the Planet X Nibiru standing above our North Pole as “The Cosmic Tree”!
But Planet X notwithstanding, the flaw in Talbott’s video is obvious.
Dr. Velikovsky explicitly stated in his KRONOS article that this hypothetical “Saturn Theory” preceded the so-called “Birth of Venu’s”
that he described in Worlds In Collision.
Yet for Talbott’s scenario to work, it includes a Planet Venus revolving around Saturn and thus intrinsically contradicts Dr. Velikovsky’s original idea.
David Talbott’s video can be obtained from the Kronia Group.
On page 53 Andy writes the following, and I certainly agree with him.
His thoughts are worth repeating here. “The idea that there is a massive undiscovered planetary body orbiting the sun is almost 100 years old now.
It is certainly not a new idea, but is one whose popularity has fluctuated down the years.
At the moment, it is a possibility that is regaining a certain amount of scientific credibility.
An idea, perhaps, whose time has arrived.
“Our science and technology seems to progress at an accelerating rate, and this tends to make us all a little complacent about what remains to be discovered.
It seems common sense that any scientific endeavor lasting 100 years would have certainly reached a conclusion by now,
as the means to discover the answer has improved. Yet, many of the most important scientific questions remain unanswered:
a cure for cancer; a renewable energy source; a unified field theory in physics, to name but a few. These problems remind us that our knowledge of the cosmos,
the Earth and ourselves is far from complete, and that science has much to learn.
“And so it is with our knowledge of the solar system. Because we are looking further and further into space with larger and more technologically refined telescopes,
we have a tendency to assume that everything in-between has been discovered, catalogued and understood. This is far from the truth in reality.
“Astronomy is only as good as its ability to pick up light sources, or sources of other types of radiation,
and distinguish them from other similar sources. Our eyes, searching the heavens at night, perform the most simple form of astronomy,
detecting the light from distant stars. Yet we cannot see closer objects, including the outer planets of the solar system beyond Saturn,
nor the asteroids and distant comets.”
Andy then makes an analogy to a garden in front of a house. If one were standing at the gate to the garden at night,
one could see the lighted house beyond the garden (stars) but not see all the dark details of the garden itself (outer solar system).
And finally, regarding this hunt for Planet X and other undiscovered objects, on page 80 Andy concludes, rather lamentably,
“This is a hunt for a needle in a haystack, with the lights turned off.”
Throughout his book, Andy cites references to Dr. Carl Sagan, who was one of the bitterest philosophical enemies of Dr. Immanuel Velikovsky, I might add.
Andy wrote me in an email that he was trying to present his material as much as possible in a way to incorporate mainstream astronomical thought,
and he does that well.
On page 57 Andy remarks,
“The late Carl Sagan, a popular and brilliant scientist from Cornell University [in New York, RS],
described the potential for a dark sister companion orbiting the sun back in 1985. Sagan acknowledged the speculation surrounding a proposed Nemesis ’star’
orbiting the sun at a great distance. He even proposed a fictional scenario where ancient peoples mythologized this ’Death Star’ as the sun’s Dark Sister.
The ’Death Star’ – presumably taking it name from the equally fictitious moon-like battle station of George Lucas’s Star Wars trilogy
- could periodically bombard the solar system with comets,
when its elliptical orbit caused it to brush through the comet clouds. This, in turn, could create a periodic extinction cycle.”
For the record, here is an original quote from Carl Sagan regarding this “Demon Sun”: “There is another Sun in the sky, a Demon Sun that we cannot see.
Long ago, even before great-grandmother’s time, the Demon Sun attacked our Sun. Comets fell, and a terrible winter overtook the Earth. Almost all life was destroyed.
The Demon Sun has attacked many times before. It will attack again.”
Chapter 4 (“Binary Companion”) was particularly appealing to me.

Before It's News
http://beforeitsnews.com/space/2016/06/planet-x-nibiru-discovered-with-alma-telescope-2499538.htmlhttp://beforeitsnews.com/space/2016/06/planet-x-nibiru-discovered-with-alma-telescope-2499538.html

Before It's News
http://beforeitsnews.com/

Planet X Approaches Inner Solar System

Planet X Approaches Inner Solar System- Blue Star Kachina Appears- FEMA Prepares for Megaquakes
Saturday, June 4, 2016 17:33
(Before It's News)
FEMA Prepping for Megaquakes and Tsunamis along the West Coast in an exercise called “Cascadia Rising” June 7-14, 2016.
Another Whistleblower claims Planet X is heading towards Earth. Queen Elizabeth tells BBC staff that a “Dark Storm” is coming”.
Nibiru-Planet X system Captured on Alaskan Webcam.
Planet Helion (PX system) captured on video from PNW (USA)
The solar system appears to have a ‘new’ ninth planet.
On January 2016, two scientists announced evidence that a body nearly the size of Neptune – but as yet unseen – orbits the sun every 15,000 years. During the solar system’s infancy 4.5 billion years ago, they say, the giant planet was knocked out of the planet-forming region near the sun. Slowed down by gas, the planet settled into a distant elliptical orbit, where it still lurks today.
The claim is the strongest yet in the centuries-long search for a “Planet X” beyond Neptune.
The quest has been plagued by far-fetched claims and even outright quackery.
But the new evidence comes from a pair of respected planetary scientists,
Konstantin Batygin and Mike Brown of the California Institute of Technology (Caltech) in Pasadena, who prepared for the inevitable skepticism with detailed analyses of the orbits of other distant objects and months of computer simulations.
“If you say, ‘We have evidence for Planet X,’ almost any astronomer will say, ‘This again? These guys are clearly crazy.’ I would, too,” Brown says.
Outside scientists say their calculations stack up and express a mixture of caution and excitement about the result.
“I could not imagine a bigger deal if – and of course that’s a boldface ‘if’ – if it turns out to be right,”
says Gregory Laughlin, a planetary scientist at the University of California (UC),
Santa Cruz. “What’s thrilling about it is [the planet] is detectable.”
Batygin and Brown inferred its presence from the peculiar clustering of six previously known objects that orbit beyond Neptune.
They say there’s only a 0.007% chance, or about one in 15,000,
that the clustering could be a coincidence.
Instead, they say, a planet with the mass of 10 Earths has shepherded the six objects into their strange elliptical orbits,
tilted out of the plane of the solar system.
The orbit of the inferred planet is similarly tilted,
as well as stretched to distances that will explode previous conceptions of the solar system.
Its closest approach to the sun is seven times farther than Neptune,
or 200 astronomical units – AUs – (an AU is the distance between Earth and the sun,
about 150 million kilometers.)
And Planet X could roam as far as 600 to 1200 AU,
well beyond the Kuiper belt, the region of small icy worlds that begins at Neptune’s edge about 30 AU.
If Planet X is out there, Brown and Batygin say, astronomers ought to find more objects in telltale orbits, shaped by the pull of the hidden giant.
But Brown knows that no one will really believe in the discovery until Planet X itself appears within a telescope viewfinder.
“Until there’s a direct detection, it’s a hypothesis - even a potentially very good hypothesis,” he says.
The team has time on the one large telescope in Hawaii that is suited for the search,
and they hope other astronomers will join in the hunt.
Killing Pluto was fun,
but this is head and shoulders
above everything else.
Mike Brown, Caltech
Batygin and Brown published the result today in The Astronomical Journal (Evidence for a distant Giant Planet in the Solar System).
Alessandro Morbidelli, a planetary dynamicist at the Nice Observatory in France,
performed the peer review for the paper. In a statement, he says Batygin and Brown made a “very solid argument”
and that he is “quite convinced by the existence of a distant planet.”
Championing a ‘new’ ninth planet is an ironic role for Brown; he is better known as a planet slayer.
His 2005 discovery of Eris,
a remote icy world nearly the same size as Pluto, revealed that what was seen as the outermost planet was just one of many worlds in the Kuiper belt.
Astronomers promptly reclassified Pluto as a dwarf planet - a saga Brown recounted in his book ’How I Killed Pluto.’
Now, he has joined the centuries-old search for new planets. His method – inferring the existence of Planet X from its ghostly gravitational effects – has a respectable track record.
In 1846, for example, the French mathematician Urbain Le Verrier predicted the existence of a giant planet from irregularities in the orbit of Uranus.
Astronomers at the Berlin Observatory found the new planet, Neptune, where it was supposed to be, sparking a media sensation.
Remaining hiccups in Uranus’s orbit led scientists to think that there might yet be one more planet, and in 1906 Percival Lowell, a wealthy tycoon, began the search for what he called “Planet X” at his new observatory in Flagstaff, Arizona.
In 1930, Pluto turned up – but it was far too small to tug meaningfully on Uranus. More than half a century later, new calculations based on measurements by the Voyager spacecraft revealed that the orbits of Uranus and Neptune were just fine on their own: No Planet X was needed.
Yet the allure of Planet X persisted…
In the 1980s, for example, researchers proposed that an unseen brown dwarf star could cause periodic extinctions on Earth by triggering fusillades of comets. In the 1990s, scientists invoked a Jupiter-sized planet at the solar system’s edge to explain the origin of certain oddball comets.
Just last month, researchers claimed to have detected the faint microwave glow of an outsized rocky planet some 300 AU away, using an array of telescope dishes in Chile called the Atacama Large Millimeter Array (ALMA). (Brown was one of many skeptics, noting that ALMA’s narrow field of view made the chances of finding such an object vanishingly slim.)
Brown got his first inkling of his current quarry in 2003, when he led a team that found Sedna, an object a bit smaller than both Eris and Pluto.
Sedna’s odd, far-flung orbit made it the most distant known object in the solar system at the time.
Its perihelion, or closest point to the sun, lay at 76 AU, beyond the Kuiper belt and far outside the influence of Neptune’s gravity.
The implication was clear: Something massive,
well beyond Neptune, must have pulled Sedna into its distant orbit.
(DATA) JPL; BATYGIN AND BROWN/CALTECH;
(DIAGRAM) A. CUADRA/SCIENCE
That something didn’t have to be a planet.
Sedna’s gravitational nudge could have come from a passing star, or from one of the many other stellar nurseries that surrounded the nascent sun
at the time of the solar system’s formation.
Since then, a handful of other icy objects have turned up in similar orbits.
By combining Sedna with five other weirdos,
Brown says he has ruled out stars as the unseen influence: Only a planet could explain such strange orbits.
Of his three major discoveries – Eris, Sedna, and now, potentially,
Planet X – Brown says the last is the most sensational.
“Killing Pluto was fun. Finding Sedna was scientifically interesting,” he says. “But this one, this is head and shoulders above everything else.”
Brown and Batygin were nearly beaten to the punch.
For years, Sedna was a lone clue to a perturbation from beyond Neptune. Then, in 2014, Scott Sheppard and Chad Trujillo (a former graduate student of Brown’s) published a paper describing the discovery of VP113,
another object that never comes close to the sun.
Sheppard, of the Carnegie Institution for Science in Washington, D.C.,
and Trujillo, of the Gemini Observatory in Hawaii, were well aware of the implications.
They began to examine the orbits of the two objects along with 10 other oddballs. They noticed that, at perihelion, all came very near the plane of solar system in which Earth orbits, called the ecliptic.
In a paper, Sheppard and Trujillo pointed out the peculiar clumping and raised the possibility that a distant large planet had herded the objects near the ecliptic. But they didn’t press the result any further.
Later that year, at Caltech, Batygin and Brown began discussing the results.
Plotting the orbits of the distant objects, Batygin says,
they realized that the pattern that Sheppard and Trujillo had noticed “was only half of the story.” Not only were the objects near the ecliptic at perihelia, but their perihelia were physically clustered in space (see diagram, above).
For the next year, the duo secretly discussed the pattern and what it meant. It was an easy relationship, and their skills complemented each other. Batygin, a 29-year-old whiz kid computer modeler, went to college at UC Santa Cruz for the beach and the chance to play in a rock band.
But he made his mark there by modeling the fate of the solar system over billions of years, showing that, in rare cases, it was unstable: Mercury may plunge into the sun or collide with Venus.
“It was an amazing accomplishment for an undergraduate,” says Laughlin, who worked with him at the time.
Brown, 50, is the observational astronomer, with a flair for dramatic discoveries and the confidence to match.
He wears shorts and sandals to work, puts his feet up on his desk, and has a breeziness that masks intensity and ambition. He has a program all set to sift for Planet X in data from a major telescope the moment they become publicly available later this year.
Their offices are a few doors down from each other. “My couch is nicer, so we tend to talk more in my office,” Batygin says. “We tend to look more at data in Mike’s.”
They even became exercise buddies, and discussed their ideas while waiting to get in the water at a Los Angeles, California, triathlon in the spring of 2015.
First, they winnowed the dozen objects studied by Sheppard
and Trujillo to the six most distant – discovered by six different surveys on six different telescopes.
That made it less likely that the clumping might be due to an observation bias such as pointing a telescope at a particular part of the sky.

Before It's News
http://beforeitsnews.com/space/2016/06/planet-x-approaches-inner-solar-system-blue-star-kachina-appears-fema-prepares-for-megaquakes-2499568.html

Before It's News
http://beforeitsnews.com/

2016/03/10

大摩邇（おおまに） : 星がやって来ている？？　ニビル？ ホピ族の？ １０支族の？
2016年03月14日23:52
カテゴリより一層の知識と光を求めて・・・
星がやって来ている？？　ニビル？ ホピ族の？ １０支族の？　
たまＷＥＢさんのサイトより
http://blog.goo.ne.jp/yoriissouno/e/af575da7692967f9ff70bb4b208bb14a
＜転載開始＞
・ホピ族の青い星か？？　/ イスラエルの失われた十支族の星？？
・大本教の『霊界物語』という教典にある王星なのか？？　　　　　　　
『・・・天に王星の顕はれ、地上の学者知者の驚嘆する時こそ、天国の政治の地上に移され、
 仁愛神政の世（みろくの世、ミロクの世）に近づいた時なので、これがいはゆる三千世界 の立替立直しの開始である。 』
以下のユーチューブ、今月9日の日蝕で、太平洋上の機内からの写真に注目です。
英語のですが、まぁ、なんとなく・・・・金環食を除いて空は暗闇のはずなんでは・・・・
6:38 -- 7:25  
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zq5DHjav2RI     
 (Mar 10, 2016 WSO Update - IN FACT WE DID GET AN ECLIPSE PHOTO!  Steve Olson )
天に王星　　
http://blog.goo.ne.jp/yoriissouno/s/%C5%B7%A4%CB%B2%A6%C0%B1
”天に王星の顕はれ”  
http://search.yahoo.co.jp/search?ei=UTF-8&p=%E2%80%9D%E5%A4%A9%E3%81%AB%E7%8E%8B%E6%98%9F%E3%81%AE%E9%A1%95%E3%81%AF%E3%82%8C%E2%80%9D
＜リンク先より＞
Mar 10, 2016 WSO Update - IN FACT WE DID GET AN ECLIPSE PHOTO!
Steve Olson
2016/03/10 に公開
Because Skywatch Media is awesome, we were able to show a picture of the incoming system during the eclipse.
Well, that halo is being seen literally everywhere...they just cannot hide it anymore.
The planets seem to be poking their heads out of the clouds and lots of photos and interesting stuff.
LINKS
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Qeuv_... 
Julie Griffing ISS Shots Live Steam Analysis
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TirJ0...
The Fatima Revelation
Questghost
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=njkb8...
http://www.worldufowatch.com/ Story on Orb
http://skyview.gsfc.nasa.gov/current/...
JPL admits that comets cause magnetic disruption
http://www.jpl.nasa.gov/news/news.php...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gHOSB...
Julie Griffin ALLSKYCAM Study of Wormwood
Airplane Shot of Nibiru
 https://www.facebook.com/skymednews/
http://www.allskycam.com/u.php?u=509
The Savannah Skys Australia Sky Cam
＜転載終了＞

たまＷＥＢ
http://blog.goo.ne.jp/yoriissouno/e/af575da7692967f9ff70bb4b208bb14a

大摩邇（おおまに）
http://blog.livedoor.jp/genkimaru1/archives/1983831.html